General Lighting
posted 11:01 PM Sunday, December 07, 2008 by jgalamb2
In terms of energy consumption, some simple calculations show that it is better to use recessed lighting rather than the linear LED bulb/fixture that architecture had showed us. Basically, the 16 recessed lights will use less than 2 solar panels whereas to get the same amount of light, we would need roughly 20 linear ft of fixtures which will use approximately 4 solar panels to operate. In other words, the use of recessed lighting will use less than 4% of all the power supplied by the solar panels whereas the linear bulbs would use about 10%. We need to reduce the lighting load as much as possible; therefore, we must use recessed lighting if we want to seriously compete in the energy balance aspect of the competition.
There may be a way to develop fixtures or shape the ceiling to help create a linear feel even with using the recessed lighting.
Joseph Galambos
Samantha Gunter
Comments
Archive
- 2009 (39)
- 2008 (68)
- December (11)
- Insulation Report (Dec 19)
- Clothes Washers and Dryers (Dec 19)
- HVAC System report (Dec 18)
- Risk reward analysis for home automation (Dec 17)
- Appliances for SD House (Dec 13)
- Standby Power - Energy Vampires (Dec 10)
- Windows/Shading (Dec 10)
- Control, Home Automation (Dec 10)
- Racking Final Decisions (Dec 9)
- General Lighting (Dec 7)
- Lighting (Dec 2)
- November (5)
- October (21)
- September (27)
- August (2)
- June (1)
- February (1)
- December (11)